CaliforniaSchoolsMira Monte High

Mira Monte High

PublicRegular
Bakersfield, California · Kern High
Teachers88.0FTE
Ratio24.7:1students per teacher
Students2,170enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students2,170
Grade Span9–12
Student:Teacher24.7:1
Free/Reduced Lunch94%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
24.4:1
1.2%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
84
4.5%vs prior yr
Enrollment
2,048
5.6%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:357
16.8%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:5,356
64.7%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:1,339
48.0%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
1:2,678
22.0%vs prior yrSSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.5:117.1:119.6:122.1:124.6:127.2:12020202120222023202426.3:123.6:124.7:124.7:124.4:1Mira Monte HighUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

1,9982,1442,2902,4362,5822,728828895101108114202020212022202320242,6782,6472,2932,1702,048102112938884EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment2,6782,6472,2932,1702,048
Teacher FTE102112938884
Pupil : Teacher ratio26.3:123.6:124.7:124.7:124.4:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:2,1401:4,2801:6,4201:8,5601:10,7002015201720201:5151:4291:3571:9,9081:3,4351:2,678Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:3,2731:6,5461:9,8191:13,0921:16,3652015201720201:15,1531:15,1531:5,3561:2,5761:2,5761:1,339Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)567.5
Nurses (FTE)0.20.20.5
Psychologists (FTE)112
Social Workers (FTE)0.30.81
Counselor : Pupils1:5151:4291:3571:250
Nurse : Pupils1:15,1531:15,1531:5,3561:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:2,5761:2,5761:1,3391:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:9,9081:3,4351:2,6781:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.