CaliforniaSchoolsRancho Pico Junior High

Rancho Pico Junior High

PublicRegular
Stevenson Ranch, California · William S. Hart Union High
Teachers37.0FTE
Ratio22.9:1students per teacher
Students848enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students848
Grade Span7–8
Student:Teacher22.9:1
Free/Reduced Lunch14%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
24.1:1
5.2%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
35
5.4%vs prior yr
Enrollment
842
0.7%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:427
36%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:4,265
354%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:623
33.8%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
1:1,984
111%vs prior yrSSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.7:116.8:118.9:120.9:123.0:125.1:12020202120222023202424.4:122.2:122.6:122.9:124.1:1Rancho Pico Junior HighUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

785800814829843858353536363737202020212022202320248537987908488423536353735EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment853798790848842
Teacher FTE3536353735
Pupil : Teacher ratio24.4:122.2:122.6:122.9:124.1:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:5801:1,1601:1,7401:2,3201:2,9012015201720201:3131:3131:4271:2,6861:9401:1,984Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:9211:1,8421:2,7641:3,6851:4,6062015201720201:3,7601:9401:4,2651:7231:9401:623Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)332
Nurses (FTE)0.310.2
Psychologists (FTE)1.311.4
Social Workers (FTE)0.410.4
Counselor : Pupils1:3131:3131:4271:250
Nurse : Pupils1:3,7601:9401:4,2651:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:7231:9401:6231:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:2,6861:9401:1,9841:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.